🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.